Opened 3 years ago

Closed 2 years ago

#2491 closed help (answered)

North/South halos too small for advection

Reported by: charlie Owned by: um_support
Component: UM Model Keywords: halos
Cc: Platform: NEXCS
UM Version: 10.7



Following on from ticket number 2464, and the apparently well-known error "North/South? halos too small for advection" (see below for the whole error). I now know that it's not because of my Eocene-related changes (i.e. to the ancillary files) in u-aw739, because I have another suite (u-ay314) which is a modern run (i.e. no modifications at all to any of the ancillary files) which has also fallen over at exactly the same point and is giving exactly the same error:

???!!!???!!!???!!!???!!!???!!! ERROR ???!!!???!!!???!!!???!!!???!!!
? Error code: 15
? Error from routine: LOCATE_HDPS
? Error message: North/South? halos too small for advection.
? See the following URL for more information:
? Error from processor: 666
? Error number: 19

The only thing which links these 2 suites is the changeover of the aerosols, which I had to make mid-run from timeseries to 12 monthly climatologies (see comments 71 onwards in ticket 2464 for details). So do you think this is likely to be the cause?


Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by grenville


How did u-aw739 behave - I'm guessing it doesn't suffer the same problem? Are you in contact with Will Roberts (owner of u-au884)?


comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by charlie

Yes, it does suffer exactly the same error. Sorry if I wasn't clear. Basically I have 2 suites: u-aw739 (which has had all sorts of changes made to the ancillary files to make it Eocene, as well as a modified SST field and increased CO2) and u-ay314 (which is a straightforward modern version i.e. using all the original unmodified ancillary files and with everything else set to modern values). Both ran perfectly well for 20 years, until it came to the point where 3 of the aerosols ran out of time (because they were timeseries and only went up to 2010). So I changed these aerosols to the 12 monthly climatology versions, in both suites, and restarted. Both then failed one cycle further on, giving the same error about the halos. So surely it has to be because of this aerosol changeover? Luke warned that the changeover would create a spike (or dip, depending on the trend) in the relevant aerosols, but we thought that this impact would have worn off during my remaining 30 years of simulation. But perhaps it's this spike/dip that is causing the unrealistically high wind speeds, and therefore the error?


PS. And yes, I am in regular contact with Will, but I don't think he has ever seen this error before.

comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by willie

  • Keywords halos added

Resolved in #2582

comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by willie

  • Resolution set to answered
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.